https://youtu.be/-MSKzoI72eU
Dec 13, 2022
Mr. Andrew Bridgen MP expresses his views. 'Andrew Bridgen MP will go down as a hero in the future. He is on the right side of history'.
Standing virtually alone and delivering the truth.
A perfect metaphor for how individuals feel that has been harmed by this “vaccine”
---------------------------- Pandemic conclusion 2023 ----------------------------
Brownstone Institute: https://brownstone.org/ - very interesting, most articles and topic to current situation
Conclusion sources:
Main alternative resources:
National Canada Citizens Inquiry https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
UK Column: https://www.ukcolumn.org/live
Brownstone Institute: https://brownstone.org/ - USA
Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de - Germany
Geopolitics and Empire: https://guadalajarageopolitics.com
Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org
Interesting links to follow:
Updated: 13.02.2024
Brownstone Institute: https://brownstone.org/ - very interesting, most articles and topic to current situation
Conclusion sources:
- The death of american dream
- You can't have a war on a virus
- Futurama: Rage Against the Vaccine (2023)
- Inside the Disinformation Industry
- The Indoctrinated Brain by Dr. Michael Nehls
- Panel Discussions from Brownstone’s Third Annual Conference: Rebuild Freedom
- Malcom Roberts speach in Australia Parlament
- National Citizens Inquiry | Denis Rancourt
- Vaccine Provider Incentive Program
- Woke: A Culture War Against Europe - James Lindsay at the European Parliament
- Disturbing Rise in Cognitive Problems in 2023
- Pandemic Impressions I: The Lie of Aufarbeitung and The Great Silence
- Report: What really went on inside the Wuhan lab weeks before Covid erupted
- Brownstone Institute: Twenty Grim Realities Unearthed by Lockdowns
- Robert Mallone - Fifth Generation Warfare and Sovereignty
- European Parliament - International COVID Summit III
- Project Veritas - Pfizer is creating more variants by "direct evolution"
- Did the virus kill anyone? - by Joel Smalley
- Summary of key points
Main alternative resources:
National Canada Citizens Inquiry https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/
UK Column: https://www.ukcolumn.org/live
Brownstone Institute: https://brownstone.org/ - USA
Corona Investigative Committee: https://corona-ausschuss.de - Germany
Geopolitics and Empire: https://guadalajarageopolitics.com
Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org
Interesting links to follow:
- Dr. Robert Malone Full Interview By Joe Rogan
- Unprecedented: Deaths in Indiana for ages 18-64 are up 40%
- Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium - Session 1: The False Pandemic
- Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium - Session 2: The Going Direct Reset
- Doctors for Covid Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Symposium II - Sounding the Call
- Scandinavian Freedom Events
- Bad cattitude - SubStack
- Did the virus kill anyone?
- Event 201 - explained (DE) EN Subtitles
- COVID-19: A Second Opinion
- The Irish Inquiry - The Iconoclast Roundtable Series #3
- Off Guardian - alternative news
Updated: 13.02.2024
Vaccine dangers-UK Parliament debate
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2021 4:15 pm
Re: Vaccine dangers-UK Parliament debate
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2 ... 882231A4AF
'In a recent investigation by The BMJ into the financial conflicts of interest of the drug regulators, the sociologist Donald Light said:
“It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organisation independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data.”
He went on to say that doctors and patients
“must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding.”
Similarly, another investigation revealed that members of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had huge financial links to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation running into billions of pounds. Ministers, the media and the public know that the foundation is heavily invested in pharmaceutical industry stocks.
Unfortunately, the catastrophic mistake over the approval, and the coercion associated with this emergency-use authorisation medical intervention, are not an anomaly, and in many ways this could have been predicted by the structural failures that allowed it to occur in the first place. Those shortcomings are rooted in the increasingly unchecked visible and invisible power of multinational corporations—in this case, big pharma. We can start by acknowledging that the drug industry has a fiduciary obligation to produce profit for its shareholders, but it has no fiduciary obligation to provide the right medicines for patients.
The real scandal is that those with a responsibility to patients and with scientific integrity—namely, doctors, academic institutions and medical journals—collude with the industry for financial gain. Big pharma exerts its power by capturing the political environment through lobbying and the knowledge environment through funding university research and influencing medical education, preference shaping through capture of the media, financing think-tanks and so on. In other words, the public relations machinery of big pharma excels in subterfuge and engages in smearing and de-platforming those who call out its manipulations. No doubt it will be very busy this evening.Toggle showing location ofColumn 1090
It is no surprise, when there is so much control by an entity that has been described as “psychopathic” for its profit-making conduct, that one analysis suggests that third most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer is the side effects of prescribed medications, which were mostly avoidable. Because of those systemic failures, doctors often receive biased information, deliberately manipulated by the pharmaceutical industry, which exaggerates the benefits and the safety of their drugs. Furthermore, the former editor of The BMJ, Richard Smith, claims that research misconduct is rife and is not effectively being tackled in the UK institutions, stating:
“Something is rotten in…British medicine and has been for a long time”.
'In a recent investigation by The BMJ into the financial conflicts of interest of the drug regulators, the sociologist Donald Light said:
“It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organisation independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data.”
He went on to say that doctors and patients
“must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding.”
Similarly, another investigation revealed that members of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had huge financial links to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation running into billions of pounds. Ministers, the media and the public know that the foundation is heavily invested in pharmaceutical industry stocks.
Unfortunately, the catastrophic mistake over the approval, and the coercion associated with this emergency-use authorisation medical intervention, are not an anomaly, and in many ways this could have been predicted by the structural failures that allowed it to occur in the first place. Those shortcomings are rooted in the increasingly unchecked visible and invisible power of multinational corporations—in this case, big pharma. We can start by acknowledging that the drug industry has a fiduciary obligation to produce profit for its shareholders, but it has no fiduciary obligation to provide the right medicines for patients.
The real scandal is that those with a responsibility to patients and with scientific integrity—namely, doctors, academic institutions and medical journals—collude with the industry for financial gain. Big pharma exerts its power by capturing the political environment through lobbying and the knowledge environment through funding university research and influencing medical education, preference shaping through capture of the media, financing think-tanks and so on. In other words, the public relations machinery of big pharma excels in subterfuge and engages in smearing and de-platforming those who call out its manipulations. No doubt it will be very busy this evening.Toggle showing location ofColumn 1090
It is no surprise, when there is so much control by an entity that has been described as “psychopathic” for its profit-making conduct, that one analysis suggests that third most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer is the side effects of prescribed medications, which were mostly avoidable. Because of those systemic failures, doctors often receive biased information, deliberately manipulated by the pharmaceutical industry, which exaggerates the benefits and the safety of their drugs. Furthermore, the former editor of The BMJ, Richard Smith, claims that research misconduct is rife and is not effectively being tackled in the UK institutions, stating:
“Something is rotten in…British medicine and has been for a long time”.